This project looked at the opportunities and barriers, in terms of finance and energy efficiency, for the refurbishment of private housing in large-scale contracts.
The project used the West of England as a case study. The intended audience is investors, contractors and local authorities, interested in the economies of scale for large refurbishment contracts.
Why Existing Homes? By 2050, over 80% of the housing stock in the UK will be made up of the homes that we live in today. The housing sector as a whole represents 28.6% of total emissions in the Greater Bristol area and achieving deep carbon cuts in this sector is imperative.
Why Private Homes? Action has been very slow moving in the private sector (both amongst homeowners and private landlords) and refurbishment has only really taken place at an individual home level. Private housing accounts for 93% of Bristol City housing and thus represents a significant part of the carbon challenge.
What Next? When dealing with the existing housing stock, buildings range in age, materials, design and state, which complicates how improvements can be implemented. In addition, there are only broad estimates of how much this would cost and what impact any improvements would have on carbon reduction with no clearly established funding routes.
A model was developed to demonstrate the carbon and cost savings that could be achieved by retrofitting generic housing types that broadly represent the housing stock of Bristol. The method encompassed developing baseline house types; selecting the most appropriate refit options available; modelling the energy and carbon savings using NHER SAP software; and feeding in cost estimates provided by project partners.
Packages of measures were used for ease of implementation, these were:
Package 1
Energy saving lighting
Draught proofing
Roof insulation
Cavity wall insulation
Package 2
New windows
New boiler and controls
Package 3
Internal wall insulation
Floor insulation
Package 4
External wall insulation
Floor insulation
Solar thermal
Solar PV
The model compares cost, energy and carbon savings. Users can enter the number of each house type to be upgraded and specify any existing refit measures already in place and the packages of measures to be installed.
The model then calculates the SAP rating, CO2 reduction and cost per house (or group of houses), as well as a cost per kg of CO2. For groups of housing, a ‘clustered’ (within walking distance) or ‘dispersed’ scenario can be selected. Contractors can make considerable savings when they can work from one base and share equipment and skills.
Selected results are displayed in the table below as an example.
A retrofit project carried out at scale in local neighbourhoods will save money and help local authorities to reach carbon reduction targets.
The results of this research will feed into Forum for the Future’s Refit West Project, which is aiming to retrofit 1000 private homes in the West of England by 2011.
Project Team:
Ann Cousins, Arup
Matt Gitsham, Arup
Alex Joss, Arup
Project Steering Group:
Dave Beattie, Arup
Sue Wolff, Arup
Gordon Hutchinson, Forum for the Future
Lorna Pelly, Forum for the Future
Ben Ross, Forum for the Future
Adrian Marshman, ROK
For more information, please contact: Ann Cousins, ann.cousins@arup.com or Lorna Pelly, l.pelly@forumforthefuture.org
© 2011 Forum for the Future | Terms of Use | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Login | Logout
The Forum for the Future is a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Overseas House, 19-23 Ironmonger Row, London, EC1V 3QN, UK. Registered charity no. 1040519. Company no. 2959712. VAT registration no. 677 7475 70